Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD9D5D393 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44275 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 06:56:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44168 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 06:56:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44140 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2012 06:56:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:56:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.223.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.177] (HELO mail-ie0-f177.google.com) (209.85.223.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:56:48 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id k13so3562276iea.8 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:56:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=OR5PAyCsOkZWEdMrnj4SAj8vWxA8JlOa10Z/uV3aMzM=; b=G5aOjOcNupRBCtda4nLKp31OcvUrvkekc0D/B4QYF+vlQOrPZT5EEW6YWW7xQ6GL9d 34VwesuCVdJzoXtKj808Lf7Ed0bdZL0ZoivxWNd1kBGykwEQc8W6pMayMwILToduQ3E6 t8X5/6WZX5vE3efSHFnAE3xQFHaFUPWq1782OgSEtItXt/iinGWKsvDHaUvVsxnhdo6L PQja96bjS0lTNsoNhEcJHjj9ADaxH2ckqe4IvDsEiEWuvUGzWLxfxzxBm2j2QbViD5Xb ce6uWKSf9pscu+jbHwqxofEPfia4LY65GLnJYhH202e4XutqaZ2xgp+tbXwZG204pkR5 lrnw== Received: by 10.50.40.225 with SMTP id a1mr16006865igl.7.1355381787314; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:56:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.6.129 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:56:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:26:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: which version should I take To: "" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLcrbBBYhDFY6ini7JP1d2ydyEboNqiED0gMJJJslT0dNrQSfJgUvV8cg4KAFfUdy9lasl X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If your production target is bit far away, I'd encourage setting up and using the 2.x based releases for its feature set that may aid you in your design. We'll be releasing 2.0.3 soon. However, if you want the older, stable code, go with the 1.x based releases= . On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Hern=E1n Leoni wr= ote: > Hi, > > I would like to check if there is any information about release dates for > new versions, we are starting a new project that would be ready in some > months and we need to decide which hadoop version to use. > Is there any release date for version 2? Should I keep using version 1? > > Thanks in advance. > > Hernan > --=20 Harsh J