Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19444D01F for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51023 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 09:26:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50728 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 09:26:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50692 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2012 09:26:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:26:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.176] (HELO mail-lb0-f176.google.com) (209.85.217.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:26:50 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k6so1549594lbo.35 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:26:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=IcxG/WhFbqbaKz0w2lYQ+dPeguc/DPNjPCGvAwdEVb4=; b=X2HO0aMraSAsjmX/QATiXY+pQuDHsUll5pcO4sui6bRSaSYF+PB0+E9Va35LiywSG1 STpa2SnXhzH1HbSKRZjLcVgMyh1HumINWGex/FlTrCaOXZNibCBlBFAfz6sxEtmxGa+z HwBcgWJS1jsSNCA/anwEmU2AVkb9DNbK5bLTjGPGhSFZQtYTxhUueALWxzLOvqIlHQ3Z /wZSIqoOYFzu5JpzTtom36ZcXZ8n46TD2MxCq0R7LyH7FGfdU26XnxZnZ+X18J2BPIqW 1qeMCpps8DhU5TbaBFYeZSGogxtKnXUHoL19YlJC54p5XmKGhEt+ZefWy9BrceidCRwV KQhg== Received: by 10.152.134.243 with SMTP id pn19mr109473lab.11.1355390789575; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:26:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.24.194 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:26:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:56:09 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: which version should I take To: Ivan Ryndin Cc: "" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmlybawHgraErZwYtQolgfnq6WHVX+RAPdL+AaEyG6AkPs8DNZLGVv2N/s+KtETOX5JOVlP X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I do feel so. This is the ongoing discussion with further details: http://search-hadoop.com/m/4U27S1Zf9eF1 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Ivan Ryndin wrote: > Harsh, > > can you please tell will 2.0.3 release be ready to the end of Jan 2013? > > Regards, > Ivan > > > 2012/12/13 Harsh J >> >> If your production target is bit far away, I'd encourage setting up >> and using the 2.x based releases for its feature set that may aid you >> in your design. We'll be releasing 2.0.3 soon. >> >> However, if you want the older, stable code, go with the 1.x based >> releases. >> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Hern=E1n Leoni >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to check if there is any information about release dates >> > for >> > new versions, we are starting a new project that would be ready in som= e >> > months and we need to decide which hadoop version to use. >> > Is there any release date for version 2? Should I keep using version 1= ? >> > >> > Thanks in advance. >> > >> > Hernan >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Harsh J > > > > --=20 Harsh J