Mailing-List: contact hdfs-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of joey@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: Hadoop-Hbase latest releases compatibility
References: 
 <7D9AF4B98807C54EBADEA75DF6D5ACB7E3892F5F@NDA-HCLC-EVS04.HCLC.CORP.HCL.IN>
 <CAMbwnT-7ddeJzTRrTaBYgZ51gKvrmmPKoU5txqZe90hmbpDKuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <7D9AF4B98807C54EBADEA75DF6D5ACB7E389312C@NDA-HCLC-EVS04.HCLC.CORP.HCL.IN>
 <83E339EB-26DA-46F4-95BA-A185E3AF5CFB@hortonworks.com>
 <7D9AF4B98807C54EBADEA75DF6D5ACB7E389316F@NDA-HCLC-EVS04.HCLC.CORP.HCL.IN>
From: Joey Echeverria <joey@cloudera.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: 
 <7D9AF4B98807C54EBADEA75DF6D5ACB7E389316F@NDA-HCLC-EVS04.HCLC.CORP.HCL.IN>
Message-Id: <43958B44-1F78-4924-B764-E31952BED30D@cloudera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:47:18 -0500
To: "hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

Yes.=20


On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:39, Stuti Awasthi <stutiawasthi@hcl.com> wrote:

> Ok. Thanks Arun
> So is Hadoop-1.0.0 is compatible with Hbase stable release with append sup=
port ?
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:acm@hortonworks.com]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:30 PM
> To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Hadoop-Hbase latest releases compatibility
>=20
> hadoop-1.0.0 has more content than hadoop-0.20.205, most are critical fixe=
s and some are performance fixes.
>=20
> One in particular, 'local read shortcut' is very nice for HBase (in non-se=
cure mode).
>=20
> Arun
>=20
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 11:40 PM, Stuti Awasthi wrote:
>=20
>> Also wanted to confirm that is Hadoop 0.20.205 is same as Hadoop 1.0.0=20=

>> . I have read it at some places that Hadoop0.20.205 is renamed to=20
>> Hadoop 1.0.0
>>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stuti Awasthi
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:35 PM
>> To: user@hbase.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Hadoop-Hbase latest releases compatibility
>>=20
>> Thanks Praveenesh .
>>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: praveenesh kumar [mailto:praveenesh@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:27 PM
>> To: user@hbase.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Hadoop-Hbase latest releases compatibility
>>=20
>> I am using Hadoop 0.20.205 + HBase -0.90.5 in production.
>> Both are working fine with each other.
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> Praveenesh
>>=20
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Stuti Awasthi <stutiawasthi@hcl.com> wro=
te:
>>=20
>>> Hi,
>>> I wanted to know which Hadoop and Hbase release are the most stable.=20
>>> I have read that Hadoop-0.20.205 is compatible with Hbase-0.90.5=20
>>> (current stable release) along with append support.
>>>=20
>>> But current stable release of Hadoop is hadoop-0.20.203.*  Should I=20
>>> use
>>> Hadoop-0.20.205 version or Hadoop-0.20.203* version with Hbase-0.90.5
>>>=20
>>> Please Suggest
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>> Stuti Awasthi
>>> HCL Comnet Systems and Services Ltd
>>> F-8/9 Basement, Sec-3,Noida.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> ________________________________
>>> ::DISCLAIMER::
>>>=20
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>>=20
>>> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential=20
>>> and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
>>> It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its=20
>>> affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely=20
>>> those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of=20
>>> HCL or its affiliates.
>>> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,=20
>>> modification, distribution and / or publication of this message=20
>>> without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is=20
>>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please=20
>>> delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail=20
>>> and attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>>=20
>=20