hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10419) Building HDFS on top of new storage layer (HDDS)
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2019 04:08:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16770763#comment-16770763
] 

Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-10419:
---------------------------------------------

{quote}bq.  Konstantine has proposed  other alternatives and we would  evaluate (a) or
(b) for his alternative.  I am not locked into any particular path or how we would do it.
{quote}
Any conclusion on this idea? Looks it [~shv] idea is better. but I have following doubts.Please
do correct me.
 * I think,BlockTokenSecretManger need to move out of Namenode.
 * will we introduce two RPC's to Storagepolices,EC, Snapshots and fsck..etc which associate
with src and blockID
 * Still working set can be keep in memory?

> Building HDFS on top of new storage layer (HDDS)
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10419
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10419
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: Evolving NN using new block-container layer.pdf
>
>
> In HDFS-7240, Ozone defines storage containers to store both the data and the metadata.
The storage container layer provides an object storage interface and aims to manage data/metadata
in a distributed manner. More details about storage containers can be found in the design
doc in HDFS-7240.
> HDFS can adopt the storage containers to store and manage blocks. The general idea is:
> # Each block can be treated as an object and the block ID is the object's key.
> # Blocks will still be stored in DataNodes but as objects in storage containers.
> # The block management work can be separated out of the NameNode and will be handled
by the storage container layer in a more distributed way. The NameNode will only manage the
namespace (i.e., files and directories).
> # For each file, the NameNode only needs to record a list of block IDs which are used
as keys to obtain real data from storage containers.
> # A new DFSClient implementation talks to both NameNode and the storage container layer
to read/write.
> HDFS, especially the NameNode, can get much better scalability from this design. Currently
the NameNode's heaviest workload comes from the block management, which includes maintaining
the block-DataNode mapping, receiving full/incremental block reports, tracking block states
(under/over/miss replicated), and joining every writing pipeline protocol to guarantee the
data consistency. These work bring high memory footprint and make NameNode suffer from GC.
HDFS-5477 already proposes to convert BlockManager as a service. If we can build HDFS on top
of the storage container layer, we not only separate out the BlockManager from the NameNode,
but also replace it with a new distributed management scheme.
> The storage container work is currently in progress in HDFS-7240, and the work proposed
here is still in an experimental/exploring stage. We can do this experiment in a feature branch
so that people with interests can be involved.
> A design doc will be uploaded later explaining more details.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message