From hdfs-issues-return-233449-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 12 22:56:04 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C9AFB180630 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 22:56:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 94120 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2018 20:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94105 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2018 20:56:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:56:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 69CFEC9463 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:56:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -109.501 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.501 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yVYYu4wxMBCs for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 398815F48B for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 76919E0047 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3091C2183D for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:56:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kitti Nanasi (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13882) Set a maximum for the delay before retrying locateFollowingBlock MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13882?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kitti Nanasi updated HDFS-13882: -------------------------------- Attachment: HDFS-13882.002.patch > Set a maximum for the delay before retrying locateFollowingBlock > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-13882 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13882 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 3.1.0 > Reporter: Kitti Nanasi > Assignee: Kitti Nanasi > Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13882.001.patch, HDFS-13882.002.patch > > > More and more we are seeing cases where customers are running into the ja= va io exception "Unable to close file because the last block does not have = enough number of replicas" on client file closure. The common workaround is= to increase dfs.client.block.write.locateFollowingBlock.retries from 5 to = 10.=C2=A0 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org