From hdfs-issues-return-231297-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 28 22:59:09 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 17DCC180674 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:59:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 76617 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2018 20:59:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76597 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2018 20:59:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:59:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C5B521A150E for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:59:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -109.501 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.501 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4aAw7axw1_7D for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 744F55F197 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BC0B1E25AA for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5C96626B5B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:59:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Siyao Meng (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13879) FileSystem: Should allowSnapshot() and disallowSnapshot() be part of it? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siyao Meng updated HDFS-13879: ------------------------------ Summary: FileSystem: Should allowSnapshot() and disallowSnapshot() be part of it? (was: FileSystem: Should allowSnapshot() and disallowSnapshot() be part it?) > FileSystem: Should allowSnapshot() and disallowSnapshot() be part of it? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-13879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13879 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Siyao Meng > Priority: Major > > I wonder whether we should add allowSnapshot() and disallowSnapshot() to FileSystem abstract class. > My rationale is that createSnapshot(), renameSnapshot() and deleteSnapshot() are already part of it. > Any reason why we don't want to do this? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org