hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anu Engineer (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-12615) Router-based HDFS federation phase 2
Date Mon, 14 May 2018 20:18:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474747#comment-16474747
] 

Anu Engineer edited comment on HDFS-12615 at 5/14/18 8:17 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

when you have 97 bug fixes to be made on a feature, I believe it is time to open up your branch.
I have no issues with the check-ins, but I just want them to come in a stable transactional
faction. Some of the work that you are proposing including security and DN interaction with
Router are indeed fundamental changes. Just to point out, the security work has a patch and
 [~daryn] had to request a design doc. 

My request is to move all Phase-2 items of RBF to a branch and merge when it is ready. Right
now, it seems that small changes are being intermingled with big-ticket items and directly
committed to trunk. If this project made zero impact to the rest of the code, i would *not*
be this concerned, but if we are making fundamental changes, let us bring it via a branch.


was (Author: anu):
when you have 97 bug fixes to be made on a feature, I believe it is time to open up your branch.
I have no issues with the check-ins, but I just want them to come in a stable transactional
faction. Some of the work that you are proposing including security and DN interaction with
Router are indeed fundamental changes. Just to point out, the security work has a patch and
 [~daryn] had to request a design doc. 

My request is to move all Phase-2 items of RBF to a branch and merge when it is ready. Right
now, it seems that small changes are being intermingled with big-ticket items and directly
committed to trunk. If this project made zero impact to the rest of the code, it would *not*
be this concerned, but if we are making fundamental changes, let us bring it via a branch.

> Router-based HDFS federation phase 2
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12615
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12615
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>            Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: RBF
>
> This umbrella JIRA tracks set of improvements over the Router-based HDFS federation (HDFS-10467).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message