Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10515200D4C for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:21:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0EC08160C04; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 55CFB160BF6 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:21:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 30110 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2017 20:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30099 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2017 20:21:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DFA6BC2256 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.011 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD=0.2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YRsToiXsFXXp for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 171385F1BA for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A8998E0D34 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 459DD2105F for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HDFS-12594) snapshotDiff fails if the report exceeds the RPC response limit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:21:04 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze updated HDFS-12594: --------------------------------------- Summary: snapshotDiff fails if the report exceeds the RPC response limit (was: SnapshotDiff - snapshotDiff fails if the snapshotDiff report exceeds the RPC response limit) > snapshotDiff fails if the report exceeds the RPC response limit > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-12594 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12594 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: hdfs > Reporter: Shashikant Banerjee > Assignee: Shashikant Banerjee > Attachments: HDFS-12594.001.patch, HDFS-12594.002.patch, HDFS-12594.003.patch, HDFS-12594.004.patch, HDFS-12594.005.patch, HDFS-12594.006.patch, HDFS-12594.007.patch, HDFS-12594.008.patch, HDFS-12594.009.patch, HDFS-12594.010.patch, SnapshotDiff_Improvemnets .pdf > > > The snapshotDiff command fails if the snapshotDiff report size is larger than the configuration value of ipc.maximum.response.length which is by default 128 MB. > Worst case, with all Renames ops in sanpshots each with source and target name equal to MAX_PATH_LEN which is 8k characters, this would result in at 8192 renames. > > SnapshotDiff is currently used by distcp to optimize copy operations and in case of the the diff report exceeding the limit , it fails with the below exception: > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestSnapshotDiffReport > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 112.095 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestSnapshotDiffReport > testDiffReportWithMillionFiles(org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestSnapshotDiffReport) Time elapsed: 111.906 sec <<< ERROR! > java.io.IOException: Failed on local exception: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RpcException: RPC response exceeds maximum data length; Host Details : local host is: "hw15685.local/10.200.5.230"; destination host is: "localhost":59808; > Attached is the proposal for the changes required. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org