Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63CF200D0A for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 03:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B46A31609E1; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 060511609DD for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 03:11:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 75218 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2017 01:11:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75193 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2017 01:11:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 70E3A183439 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inTIDaREhB-p for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5B7F5610D0 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5F2C3E0933 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 47893244FE for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharat Viswanadham (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12499) dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir property is currently namenode specific key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:11:08 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16172567#comment-16172567 ] Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDFS-12499: ------------------------------------------- This change is brought by HDFS-2934 jira. Refer [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2934] for more info. As this property dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir is nameservice specific key moving it to Nameservice specific key section. Having it in namenode specific key section can cause issues. > dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir property is currently namenode specific key > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-12499 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12499 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharat Viswanadham > Assignee: Bharat Viswanadham > Labels: Incompatible > Attachments: HDFS-12499.01.patch > > > HDFS + Federation cluster +QJM > dfs.shared.edits.dir property can be set as > 1. dfs.shared.edits.dir.<> > 2. dfs.shared.edits.dir.<> .<> > Configuring both ways are supported currently. Option 2 should not be supported, as for a particular nameservice quoram of journal nodes should be same. > If option 2 is supported, users can configure for a nameservice Id which is having two namenodes, they can configure different values for journal nodes. which is incorrect. > Example: > > dfs.nameservices > ns1,ns2 > > > dfs.ha.namenodes.ns1 > nn1,nn2 > > > dfs.ha.namenodes.ns2 > nn1,nn2 > > > dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns1.nn1 > qjournal://mycluster-node-1:8485;mycluster-node-2:8485;mycluster-node-3:8485/ns1 > > > dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns1.nn1 > qjournal://mycluster-node-3:8485;mycluster-node-4:8485;mycluster-node-5:8485/ns1 > > > dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns2.nn1 > qjournal://mycluster-node-1:8485;mycluster-node-2:8485;mycluster-node-3:8485/ns2 > > > dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns2.nn1 > qjournal://mycluster-node-3:8485;mycluster-node-4:8485;mycluster-node-5:8485/ns2 > > This jira is to discuss do we need to support 2nd option way of configuring or remove it? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org