Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74792200D09 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:23:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7302C1609C8; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B84C41609C6 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:23:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 93833 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2017 16:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93366 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2017 16:23:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 769E2C5012 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OoxBezwvfgDT for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id C5AF760FC8 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5B566E06BF for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9C23D24174 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Anu Engineer (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-11921) Ozone: KSM: Unable to put keys with zero length MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:23:07 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anu Engineer resolved HDFS-11921. --------------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem > Ozone: KSM: Unable to put keys with zero length > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-11921 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11921 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ozone > Affects Versions: HDFS-7240 > Reporter: Anu Engineer > Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh > Priority: Minor > Labels: OzonePostMerge > Attachments: HDFS-11921-HDFS-7240.001.patch > > > As part of working on HDFS-11909, I was trying to put zero length keys. I found that put key refuses to do that. Here is the call trace, > bq. at ScmBlockLocationProtocolClientSideTranslatorPB.allocateBlock > we check if the block size is greater than 0, which makes sense since we should not call into SCM to allocate a block of zero size. > However these 2 calls are invoked for creating the key, so that metadata for key can be created, we should probably take care of this behavior here. > bq. ksm.KeyManagerImpl.allocateKey > bq. ksm.KeySpaceManager.allocateKey(KeySpaceManager.java:428) > Another way to fix this might be to just allocate a block with at least 1 byte always, which might be easier than special casing code. > [~vagarychen] Would you like to fix this in the next patch you are working on ? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org