hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bharat Viswanadham (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12499) dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir property is currently namenode specific key
Date Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:59:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16175205#comment-16175205
] 

Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDFS-12499:
-------------------------------------------

Hi [~arpitagarwal]
Thank your for your comments.
This Jira is created from discussion and review of HDFS-12486 jira.
As if it is namenode specific, there can be chances of configuring different journanl nodes
for different namenodes in a same nameservice. To avoid that kind of situation, this change
can be helpful. If there is any other reason for this, I am also not completely sure.

And also referring https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2934, in that jira comments
also it is mentioned dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir is a nameservice specific from comments,
instead of configuring it as namenode specific.



> dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir property is currently namenode specific key
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12499
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Bharat Viswanadham
>            Assignee: Bharat Viswanadham
>              Labels: Incompatible
>         Attachments: HDFS-12499.01.patch, HDFS-12499.02.patch
>
>
> HDFS + Federation cluster +QJM
> dfs.shared.edits.dir property can be set as
> 1. dfs.shared.edits.dir.<<nameserviceId>> 
> 2. dfs.shared.edits.dir.<<nameserviceId>> .<<namenodId>>
> Configuring both ways are supported currently. Option 2 should not be supported, as for
a particular nameservice quorum of journal nodes should be same.
> If option 2 is supported, users can configure for a nameservice Id which is having two
namenodes, they can configure different values for journal nodes. which is incorrect.
> Example:
> <property>
>     <name>dfs.nameservices</name>
>     <value>ns1,ns2</value>
>   </property>
>   <property>
>     <name>dfs.ha.namenodes.ns1</name>
>     <value>nn1,nn2</value>
>   </property>
>   <property>
>     <name>dfs.ha.namenodes.ns2</name>
>     <value>nn1,nn2</value>
>   </property>
> <property>
>     <name>dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns1.nn1</name>
>     <value>qjournal://mycluster-node-1:8485;mycluster-node-2:8485;mycluster-node-3:8485/ns1</value>
>   </property>
> <property>
>     <name>dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns1.nn1</name>
>     <value>qjournal://mycluster-node-3:8485;mycluster-node-4:8485;mycluster-node-5:8485/ns1</value>
>   </property>
>   <property>
>     <name>dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns2.nn1</name>
>     <value>qjournal://mycluster-node-1:8485;mycluster-node-2:8485;mycluster-node-3:8485/ns2</value>
>   </property>
>   <property>
>     <name>dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.ns2.nn1</name>
>     <value>qjournal://mycluster-node-3:8485;mycluster-node-4:8485;mycluster-node-5:8485/ns2</value>
>   </property>
> This jira is to discuss do we need to support 2nd option way of configuring or remove
it?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message