hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-11965) [SPS]: Should give chance to satisfy the low redundant blocks before removing the xattr
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:46:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16076345#comment-16076345
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-11965:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 15m 26s{color} | {color:blue}
Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color} |
{color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color}
| {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 12m 41s{color}
| {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 45s{color} |
{color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 37s{color}
| {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 51s{color} |
{color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 45s{color} |
{color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 39s{color} |
{color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 46s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 43s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 43s{color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 34s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 48s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color}
| {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 50s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 37s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}117m 39s{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 19s{color}
| {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}157m 13s{color} | {color:black}
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestRollingUpgrade |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFileTruncate |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeUUID |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:a9ad5d6 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-11965 |
| JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12875875/HDFS-11965-HDFS-10285.006.patch
|
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  unit  findbugs
 checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 93d20d5a683f 3.13.0-123-generic #172-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 26 18:04:35 UTC 2017
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-10285 / 258fdc6 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_131 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20171/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
|  Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20171/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20171/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> [SPS]: Should give chance to satisfy the low redundant blocks before removing the xattr
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-11965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11965
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-10285
>            Reporter: Surendra Singh Lilhore
>            Assignee: Surendra Singh Lilhore
>         Attachments: HDFS-11965-HDFS-10285.001.patch, HDFS-11965-HDFS-10285.002.patch,
HDFS-11965-HDFS-10285.003.patch, HDFS-11965-HDFS-10285.004.patch, HDFS-11965-HDFS-10285.005.patch,
HDFS-11965-HDFS-10285.006.patch
>
>
> The test case is failing because all the required replicas are not moved in expected
storage. This is happened because of delay in datanode registration after cluster restart.
> Scenario :
> 1. Start cluster with 3 DataNodes.
> 2. Create file and set storage policy to WARM.
> 3. Restart the cluster.
> 4. Now Namenode and two DataNodes started first and  got registered with NameNode. (one
datanode  not yet registered)
> 5. SPS scheduled block movement based on available DataNodes (It will move one replica
in ARCHIVE based on policy).
> 6. Block movement also success and Xattr removed from the file because this condition
is true {{itemInfo.isAllBlockLocsAttemptedToSatisfy()}}.
> {code}
> if (itemInfo != null
>                 && !itemInfo.isAllBlockLocsAttemptedToSatisfy()) {
>               blockStorageMovementNeeded
>                   .add(storageMovementAttemptedResult.getTrackId());
>             ....................
>             ......................
>             } else {
>             ....................
>             ......................
>               this.sps.postBlkStorageMovementCleanup(
>                   storageMovementAttemptedResult.getTrackId());
>             }
> {code}
> 7. Now third DN registered with namenode and its reported one more DISK replica. Now
Namenode has two DISK and one ARCHIVE replica.
> In test case we have condition to check the number of DISK replica..
> {code} DFSTestUtil.waitExpectedStorageType(testFileName, StorageType.DISK, 1, timeout,
fs);{code}
> This condition never became true and test case will be timed out.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message