Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AEA200CC2 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 01:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CF714160BE1; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 21F54160BEF for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 01:05:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6983 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2017 23:05:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6803 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2017 23:05:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6315D1AF8EE for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xgDGeNcRSvwF for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0241D5FBB8 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 70EBCE0663 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 28051240B5 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Elek, Marton (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (HDFS-12005) Ozone: Web interface for SCM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:05:05 -0000 Elek, Marton created HDFS-12005: ----------------------------------- Summary: Ozone: Web interface for SCM Key: HDFS-12005 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12005 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Sub-task Components: ozone Affects Versions: HDFS-7240 Reporter: Elek, Marton Assignee: Elek, Marton This is a propsal about how a web interface could be implemented for SCM (and later for KSM) similar to the namenode ui. 1. JS framework There are three big option here. A.) One is to use a full featured web framework with all the webpack/npm minify/uglify magic. Build time the webpack/npm scripts should be run and the result will be added to the jar file. B.) It could be simplified if the generated minified/uglified js files are added to the project on commit time. It requires an additional step for every new patch (to generate the new minified javascripts) but doesn't require additional JS build tools during the build. C.) The third option is to make it as simple as possible similar to the current namenode ui which uses javascript but every dependency is commited (without JS minify/uglify and other preprocessing). I prefer to the third one as: * I have seen a lot of problems during frequent builds od older tez-ui versions (bower version mismatch, npm version mismatch, npm transitive dependency problems, proxy problem with older versions). All they could be fixed but requires additional JS/NPM magic/knowledge. Without additional npm build step the hdfs projects build could be kept more simple. * The complexity of the planned SCM/KSM ui (hopefully it will remain simple) doesn't require more sophisticated model. (Eg. we don't need JS require as we need only a few controllers) * HDFS developers mostly backend developers and not JS developers 2. Frameworks The big advantages of a more modern JS framework is the simplified programming model (for example with two way databinding) I suggest to use a more modern framework (not just jquery) which supports plain js (not just ECMA2015/2016/typescript) and just include the required js files in the projects (similar to the included bootstrap or as the existing namenode ui works). * React could be a good candidate but it requires more library as it's just a ui framework, even the REST calls need separated library. It could be used with plain javascript instead of JSX and classes but not straightforward, and it's more verbose. * Ember is used in yarnui2 but the main strength of the ember is the CLI which couldn't be used for the simplified approach easily. I think ember is best with the A.) option * Angular 1 is a good candidate (but not so fancy). In case of angular 1 the component based approach should be used (in that case later it could be easier to migrate to angular 2 or react) * The mainstream side of Angular 2 uses typescript, it could work with plain JS but it could require additional knowledge, most of the tutorials and documentation shows the typescript approach. I suggest to use angular 1 or react. Maybe angular is easier to use as don't need to emulate JSX with function calls, simple HTML templates could be used. 3. Backend I would prefer the approach of the existing namenode ui where the backend is just the jmx endpoint. To keep it as simple as possible I suggest to try to avoid dedicated REST backend if possible. Later we can use REST api of SCM/KSM if they will be implemented. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org