Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4FD200CA9 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 1DFD6160BDD; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 63C8B160BC0 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:53:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 8090 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2017 16:53:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8079 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2017 16:53:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1D9D41A7B80 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pD6yTausPg4F for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id E3E865FBD8 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 77D25E0D54 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1711423FFF for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Wei-Chiu Chuang (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-11956) Fix BlockToken compatibility with Hadoop 2.x clients MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:53:04 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16052130#comment-16052130 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-11956: ---------------------------------------- Hey Ewans, could you please elaborate a little bit more on this config key? For example, instead of "will allow older clients to access the system" maybe you can be more precise and say this will allow old clients (Hadoop 2.x) to access a Hadoop 3 cluster? Also, "but will prevent some newer features from working." might be better to mention you mean features added in Hadoop 3. But the way, what are the new features that would not work? Looking at HDFS-9807, looks like disabling it would break HSM block placement policy. > Fix BlockToken compatibility with Hadoop 2.x clients > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-11956 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11956 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha4 > Reporter: Andrew Wang > Assignee: Ewan Higgs > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HDFS-11956.001.patch, HDFS-11956.002.patch, HDFS-11956.003.patch > > > Seems like HDFS-9807 broke backwards compatibility with Hadoop 2.x clients. When talking to a 3.0.0-alpha4 DN with security on: > {noformat} > 2017-06-06 23:27:22,568 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Block token verification failed: op=WRITE_BLOCK, remoteAddress=/172.28.208.200:53900, message=Block token with StorageIDs [DS-c0f24154-a39b-4941-93cd-5b8323067ba2] not valid for access with StorageIDs [] > {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org