Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D900A200C46 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:58:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D7509160B95; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C62C160B5D for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:58:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 28061 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2017 16:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28050 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2017 16:58:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CC2F51889E9 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SpwJo-Lmdm93 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7C5A95FE48 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9DD03E06CC for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id BEE0A2417A for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Inigo Goiri (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-11576) Block recovery will fail indefinitely if recovery time > heartbeat interval MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:58:47 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15947498#comment-15947498 ] Inigo Goiri commented on HDFS-11576: ------------------------------------ Thanks [~lukmajercak] for the fix. The approach of keeping a timeout for each recovery in the {{BlockManager}} seems pretty clean to me. Of course we still have the problem of what happens if the recovery takes longer than the timeout. Nevertheless, I think the 3 minutes timeout should be plenty of time. Regarding the default value, does anybody have a better idea for what this value should be? Right now we have the timeout to be implicitly the heartbeat time (3 seconds by default) and we are moving it to 3 minutes. To improve the patch I would add better logging. Logging every time we ignore a block recovery seems excessive. However, I would log every time we pass the timeout and we issue a new recovery. > Block recovery will fail indefinitely if recovery time > heartbeat interval > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-11576 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11576 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: datanode, hdfs, namenode > Affects Versions: 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3, 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2 > Reporter: Lukas Majercak > Assignee: Lukas Majercak > Priority: Critical > Attachments: HDFS-11576.001.patch, HDFS-11576.repro.patch > > > Block recovery will fail indefinitely if the time to recover a block is always longer than the heartbeat interval. Scenario: > 1. DN sends heartbeat > 2. NN sends a recovery command to DN, recoveryID=X > 3. DN starts recovery > 4. DN sends another heartbeat > 5. NN sends a recovery command to DN, recoveryID=X+1 > 6. DN calls commitBlockSyncronization after succeeding with first recovery to NN, which fails because X < X+1 > ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org