Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4535A200BD4 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:20:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 43C9E160B0B; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C38B160B05 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:19:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 94920 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2016 22:19:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94893 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2016 22:19:58 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:19:58 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9C12C14F3 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10885) [SPS]: Mover tool should not be allowed to run when Storage Policy Satisfier is on MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:20:00 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15713254#comment-15713254 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-10885: -------------------------------------------- Overall patch looks nice to me. Great work [~zhouwei]. Except the corner cases of double checking, everything fine. Do you mind filing another JIRA for checking that double check corner cases as we identified some cases before? I am ok with that. I am ok to push this JIRA in, though I have small point to discuss. Its regarding configuration item name. {code} dfs.namenode.sps.enabled {code} The API what we are exposing is named as isStoragePolicySatisfierActive. This two items would be exposed to users, So, I feel we should unify in name to avoid confusions. How about naming the parameter some thing like, (option 1) dfs.storage.policy.satisfier.activate = true ? or to avoid Active/Standby HA confusions, (option 2) we need to change API name like isStoragePolicySatisfierEnabled. What do you think [~rakeshr] and others? I feel #2 may be more appropriate considering dynamic enable disable options. Other than this point, patch can be pushed. > [SPS]: Mover tool should not be allowed to run when Storage Policy Satisfier is on > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-10885 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10885 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: datanode, namenode > Affects Versions: HDFS-10285 > Reporter: Wei Zhou > Assignee: Wei Zhou > Fix For: HDFS-10285 > > Attachments: HDFS-10800-HDFS-10885-00.patch, HDFS-10800-HDFS-10885-01.patch, HDFS-10800-HDFS-10885-02.patch, HDFS-10885-HDFS-10285.03.patch, HDFS-10885-HDFS-10285.04.patch, HDFS-10885-HDFS-10285.05.patch, HDFS-10885-HDFS-10285.06.patch, HDFS-10885-HDFS-10285.07.patch, HDFS-10885-HDFS-10285.08.patch, HDFS-10885-HDFS-10285.09.patch > > > These two can not work at the same time to avoid conflicts and fight with each other. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org