Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC331200BD6 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:59:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BAD4A160AE4; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 11:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 10582160B25 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:58:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 16332 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2016 11:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16177 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2016 11:58:58 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 11:58:58 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBC22C2A6B for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 11:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 11:58:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nandakumar (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10206) getBlockLocations might not sort datanodes properly by distance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 11:59:00 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nandakumar updated HDFS-10206: ------------------------------ Attachment: HDFS-10206.003.patch > getBlockLocations might not sort datanodes properly by distance > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-10206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10206 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ming Ma > Assignee: Nandakumar > Attachments: HDFS-10206.000.patch, HDFS-10206.001.patch, HDFS-10206.002.patch, HDFS-10206.003.patch > > > If the DFSClient machine is not a datanode, but it shares its rack with some datanodes of the HDFS block requested, {{DatanodeManager#sortLocatedBlocks}} might not put the local-rack datanodes at the beginning of the sorted list. That is because the function didn't call {{networktopology.add(client);}} to properly set the node's parent node; something required by {{networktopology.sortByDistance}} to compute distance between two nodes in the same topology tree. > Another issue with {{networktopology.sortByDistance}} is it only distinguishes local rack from remote rack, but it doesn't support general distance calculation to tell how remote the rack is. > {noformat} > NetworkTopology.java > protected int getWeight(Node reader, Node node) { > // 0 is local, 1 is same rack, 2 is off rack > // Start off by initializing to off rack > int weight = 2; > if (reader != null) { > if (reader.equals(node)) { > weight = 0; > } else if (isOnSameRack(reader, node)) { > weight = 1; > } > } > return weight; > } > {noformat} > HDFS-10203 has suggested moving the sorting from namenode to DFSClient to address another issue. Regardless of where we do the sorting, we still need fix the issues outline here. > Note that BlockPlacementPolicyDefault shares the same NetworkTopology object used by DatanodeManager and requires Nodes stored in the topology to be {{DatanodeDescriptor}} for block placement. So we need to make sure we don't pollute the NetworkTopology if we plan to fix it on the server side. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org