Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C7D200BBE for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:51:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 1296A160B14; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 60983160AEE for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:51:00 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 57287 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2016 21:50:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57139 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2016 21:50:59 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:50:59 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8B62C4C90 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:50:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joe Pallas (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-11118) Block Storage for HDFS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:51:01 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15658275#comment-15658275 ] Joe Pallas commented on HDFS-11118: ----------------------------------- I have the same concern about this that I have about Ozone: it's cool stuff that is useful, but I just am not convinced that it belongs in the existing HDFS service. Like Ozone, it increases the complexity of the datanode, and the datanode already has a history of being, well, rather buggy. I'm also frankly astonished that there's a feature branch with work being committed already without any discussion on this proposal, but maybe I just don't have a good understanding of Hadoop norms. > Block Storage for HDFS > ---------------------- > > Key: HDFS-11118 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11118 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: hdfs > Reporter: Anu Engineer > Assignee: Anu Engineer > Attachments: cblock-proposal.pdf > > > This JIRA proposes extending HDFS to provide replicated block storage capabilities using Storage Containers. This is would allow users to run unmodified programs that assume that they are running on a posix file system. > With this extension, HDFS can be used like a block store. For example, YARN jobs could mount and use a volume at will. This is made possible by leveraging Storage Containers and will share the storage layer with Ozone and HDFS in future. > Please see the attached design document for more details on this proposal. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org