Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42731200BAD for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:26:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 411AC160AF3; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 87D1C160AE6 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:25:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 94737 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2016 14:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94718 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2016 14:25:58 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:25:58 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DADE2C1F54 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:25:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suraj Acharya (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10899) Add functionality to re-encrypt EDEKs. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:26:00 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15605457#comment-15605457 ] Suraj Acharya commented on HDFS-10899: -------------------------------------- {quote}I have a mixed feeling of this. As listed in the Alternatives of 'HDFS client-side', it is more admin-friendly. But it will also make the already not-so-friendly ACLs more complex.{quote} Doesn't Roll key already have an underlying generate EEK as warming of edeks? Since you mentioned re-encrypt will have the same ACLs as generate EEK I think we should be okay. That was my thinking. {quote}Also, in this example, to support the scenario where admin accidentally missed a zone 'd', we still need the reencrypt command to re-encrypt it. {quote} Regarding this my thought was that they can use the rencrypt zone command/ endpoint to re-encrypt zone 'd' (point1) > Add functionality to re-encrypt EDEKs. > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-10899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10899 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: encryption, kms > Reporter: Xiao Chen > Assignee: Xiao Chen > Attachments: Re-encrypt edek design doc.pdf > > > Currently when an encryption zone (EZ) key is rotated, it only takes effect on new EDEKs. We should provide a way to re-encrypt EDEKs after the EZ key rotation, for improved security. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org