hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9390) Block management for maintenance states
Date Sun, 16 Oct 2016 05:04:21 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15579345#comment-15579345
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9390:
---------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 20s{color} | {color:blue}
Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color} |
{color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color}
| {color:green} The patch appears to include 7 new or modified test files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 46s{color}
| {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 44s{color} |
{color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 40s{color}
| {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 50s{color} |
{color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 12s{color}
| {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 41s{color} |
{color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 38s{color} |
{color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 44s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 43s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 43s{color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 35s{color}
| {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch generated 0 new + 1062 unchanged
- 16 fixed = 1062 total (was 1078) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 50s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m  9s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color}
| {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  1s{color} | {color:green}
The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 48s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 39s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 76m 26s{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 18s{color}
| {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 95m 27s{color} | {color:black}
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestDFSUpgradeWithHA |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:9560f25 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-9390 |
| JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12833631/HDFS-9390-5.patch
|
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  unit  findbugs
 checkstyle  xml  |
| uname | Linux 0be78b44f76d 3.13.0-96-generic #143-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 29 20:15:20 UTC 2016
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 1f304b0 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_101 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/17174/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
|  Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/17174/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/17174/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Block management for maintenance states
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ming Ma
>            Assignee: Ming Ma
>         Attachments: HDFS-9390-2.patch, HDFS-9390-3.patch, HDFS-9390-4.patch, HDFS-9390-5.patch,
HDFS-9390.patch
>
>
> When a node is transitioned to/stay in/transitioned out of maintenance state, we need
to make sure blocks w.r.t. that nodes are properly handled.
> * When nodes are put into maintenance, it will first go to ENTERING_MAINTENANCE, and
make sure blocks are minimally replicated before the nodes are transitioned to IN_MAINTENANCE.
> * Do not replica blocks when nodes are in maintenance states. Maintenance replica will
remain in BlockMaps and thus is still considered valid from block replication point of view.
In other words, putting a node to “maintenance” mode won’t trigger BlockManager to replicate
its blocks.
> * Do not invalidate replicas on node under maintenance. After any file's replication
factor is reduced, NN needs to invalidate some replicas. It should exclude nodes under maintenance
in the handling.
> * Do not put IN_MAINTENANCE replicas in LocatedBlock for read operation.
> * Do not allocate any new block on nodes under maintenance.
> * Have Balancer exclude nodes under maintenance.
> * Exclude nodes under maintenance for DN cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message