Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70451200B66 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:59:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6EFEF160AB9; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B91FA160AAE for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:59:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 93620 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2016 17:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93608 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2016 17:59:21 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:59:21 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E5D2C02A4 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:59:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kihwal Lee (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10776) Revisit Hdfs Audit Logging MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:59:23 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10776?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kihwal Lee updated HDFS-10776: ------------------------------ Description:=20 HDFS audit logging is considered critical in many scenarios, but it hasn't = been always implemented consistently, especially for new features. As we ha= ve seen in HDFS-9395 and the 2.7.3 release discussions in the mailing list,= even bug fixes are tricky since some users may get greatly impacted by the= resulting incompatibility.=E2=80=82The goal of this jira is to clarify wha= t the hdfs audit logging should do and discuss potential approaches that wi= ll allows us to move forward. 1) What is the correct way of doing the hdfs audit logging? This was discus= sed in HDFS-9395, but needs to be revisited as there were discussions on th= e fix being made with wrong assumptions.=E2=80=82What needs to be fixed, if= HDFS-9395 is incorrect or incomplete? 2) What if a single standard cannot satisfy everyone? Do we need to make th= e audit logging more flexible and configurable? 3) What is the best way of introducing future bug fixes to the hdfs audit l= ogging that change the output?=E2=80=82=E2=80=82Some may not want a fix, wh= ile others may consider it critical and want it asap. CC:[~aw] was: HDFS audit logging is considered critical in many scenarios, but it hasn't = been always implemented consistently, especially for new features. As we ha= ve seen in HDFS-9395 and the 2.7.3 release discussions in the mailing list,= even bug fixes are tricky since some users may get greatly impacted by the= resulting incompatibility.=E2=80=82The goal of this jira is to clarify wha= t the hdfs audit logging should do and discuss potential approaches that wi= ll allows us to move forward. 1) What is the correct way of doing the hdfs audit logging? This was discus= sed in HDFS-9395, but needs to be revisited as there were discussions on th= e fix being made with wrong assumptions.=E2=80=82What needs to be fixed, if= HDFS-9395 is incorrect or incomplete? 2) What if a single standard cannot satisfy everyone? Do we need to make th= e audit logging more flexible and configurable? 3) What is the best way of introducing future bug fixes to the hdfs audit l= ogging that changes the output?=E2=80=82=E2=80=82Some may not want a fix, w= hile others may consider it critical and want it asap. CC:[~aw] > Revisit Hdfs Audit Logging > -------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-10776 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10776 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.7.2 > Reporter: Kuhu Shukla > Assignee: Kuhu Shukla > > HDFS audit logging is considered critical in many scenarios, but it hasn'= t been always implemented consistently, especially for new features. As we = have seen in HDFS-9395 and the 2.7.3 release discussions in the mailing lis= t, even bug fixes are tricky since some users may get greatly impacted by t= he resulting incompatibility.=E2=80=82The goal of this jira is to clarify w= hat the hdfs audit logging should do and discuss potential approaches that = will allows us to move forward. > 1) What is the correct way of doing the hdfs audit logging? This was disc= ussed in HDFS-9395, but needs to be revisited as there were discussions on = the fix being made with wrong assumptions.=E2=80=82What needs to be fixed, = if HDFS-9395 is incorrect or incomplete? > 2) What if a single standard cannot satisfy everyone? Do we need to make = the audit logging more flexible and configurable? > 3) What is the best way of introducing future bug fixes to the hdfs audit= logging that change the output?=E2=80=82=E2=80=82Some may not want a fix, = while others may consider it critical and want it asap. > CC:[~aw] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org