Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D239200B76 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:52:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 2BD2B160AAF; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F547160ACC for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:52:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 92355 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2016 18:52:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92310 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2016 18:52:22 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:52:22 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8942C1B7B for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:52:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Stephen G Ahlgren (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6994) libhdfs3 - A native C/C++ HDFS client MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:52:25 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15449810#comment-15449810 ] Stephen G Ahlgren commented on HDFS-6994: ----------------------------------------- Thank you for the note Zhanwei. I've become familiar with libhdfs3 on Linux and would like to check in with you about your thoughts for two branches (hadoop hdfs-6994 branch v. the pivotal apache-rpc-9 branch) before committing any changes. There are Windows-specific changes in the hdfs-6994 branch that aren't reflected in the pivotal code and namespace/method naming changes between the two as well. Should we try and reconcile the two branches or focus efforts on the pivotal apache-rpc-9 branch, moving Windows-specific code in as needed from elsewhere? Thank you kindly in advance, I just want to make sure we're on the same page before trundling forward. Best, Steve A. > libhdfs3 - A native C/C++ HDFS client > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-6994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6994 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: hdfs-client > Reporter: Zhanwei Wang > Assignee: Zhanwei Wang > Attachments: HDFS-6994-rpc-8.patch, HDFS-6994.patch > > > Hi All > I just got the permission to open source libhdfs3, which is a native C/C++ HDFS client based on Hadoop RPC protocol and HDFS Data Transfer Protocol. > libhdfs3 provide the libhdfs style C interface and a C++ interface. Support both HADOOP RPC version 8 and 9. Support Namenode HA and Kerberos authentication. > libhdfs3 is currently used by HAWQ of Pivotal > I'd like to integrate libhdfs3 into HDFS source code to benefit others. > You can find libhdfs3 code from github > https://github.com/Pivotal-Data-Attic/pivotalrd-libhdfs3 > http://pivotal-data-attic.github.io/pivotalrd-libhdfs3/ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org