hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10694) BlockManager.processReport() should print blockReportId in each log message.
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2016 05:03:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15412940#comment-15412940
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10694:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 12s{color} | {color:blue}
Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color} |
{color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  0s{color} | {color:red}
The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests
are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this
patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 51s{color}
| {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 44s{color} |
{color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 47s{color} |
{color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 30s{color}
| {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 53s{color} |
{color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 15s{color}
| {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 59s{color} |
{color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 55s{color} |
{color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 36s{color} |
{color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 50s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 46s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 46s{color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 46s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 46s{color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 28s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 54s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 14s{color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m  0s{color}
| {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  2m 15s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 52s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 33s{color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 47m 31s{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 19s{color}
| {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}124m 22s{color} | {color:black}
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_101 Failed junit tests | hadoop.tracing.TestTracing |
|   | hadoop.security.TestRefreshUserMappings |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.TestLazyPersistReplicaRecovery |
| JDK v1.7.0_101 Failed junit tests | hadoop.tracing.TestTracing |
|   | hadoop.security.TestRefreshUserMappings |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:b59b8b7 |
| JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12822718/HDFS-10694-branch-2.001.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-10694 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  unit  findbugs
 checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 1612110fd402 3.13.0-92-generic #139-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 20:42:26 UTC 2016
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | branch-2 / 427b540 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_101 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_101 /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_101
|
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16353/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_101.txt
|
| JDK v1.7.0_101  Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16353/testReport/
|
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16353/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> BlockManager.processReport() should print blockReportId in each log message.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10694
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10694
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: logging, namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.1
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Assignee: Yuanbo Liu
>              Labels: newbie, supportability
>         Attachments: HDFS-10694-branch-2.001.patch, HDFS-10694-branch-2.7.001.patch,
HDFS-10694.001.patch, HDFS-10694.002.patch, HDFS-10694.003.patch, HDFS-10694.004.patch
>
>
> Currently {{BlockManager.processReport()}} is printing {{blockReportId}} in some log
message, but doesn't in other. It should consistently print {{blockReportId}}. This is helpful
in debugging block report problems, so that you could see which message belongs to which report.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message