hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bob Hansen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10441) libhdfs++: HA namenode support
Date Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:29:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15391737#comment-15391737

Bob Hansen commented on HDFS-10441:

A few minor points (not necessarily worth holding up this patch):

Should HandleRpcResponse return a value or just forward-propagate to CommsError?  In the implementation,
we alternately do one, the other, or both.

RpcConnectionImpl::ConnectAndFlush logs entry at the INFO level.  I think we already log once
when we're attempting to connect, do we not?  If this is the only place we keep it, we should
include the endpoint we're connecting to in the log message.

> libhdfs++: HA namenode support
> ------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-10441
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10441
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: hdfs-client
>            Reporter: James Clampffer
>            Assignee: James Clampffer
>         Attachments: HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.000.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.002.patch,
HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.003.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.004.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.005.patch,
HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.006.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.007.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.008.patch,
HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.009.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.010.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.011.patch,
HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.012.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.013.patch, HDFS-10441.HDFS-8707.014.patch,
> If a cluster is HA enabled then do proper failover.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org

View raw message