Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4B22009C6 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 17:43:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DABD4160A49; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5119B1609AD for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 17:43:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 65725 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2016 15:43:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65659 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2016 15:43:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:43:13 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2955D2C1F69 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 15:43:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rushabh S Shah (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 31 May 2016 15:43:15 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15307937#comment-15307937 ] Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-8872: -------------------------------------- [~mingma]: any thoughts ? > Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-8872 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.6.0 > Reporter: Rushabh S Shah > Assignee: Rushabh S Shah > > Namenode ui and metasave will not report a block as missing if the only replica is on decommissioning/decomissioned node while fsck will show it as MISSING. > Since decommissioned node can be formatted/removed anytime, we can actually lose the block. > Its better to alert on namenode ui if the only copy is on decomissioned/decommissioning node. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org