Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 438AF18860 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76363 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2016 21:05:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76241 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2016 21:05:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76168 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2016 21:05:33 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:05:33 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAE82C1F69 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:05:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Chen (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9405) When starting a file, NameNode should generate EDEK in a separate thread MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15198161#comment-15198161 ] Xiao Chen commented on HDFS-9405: --------------------------------- Thanks Andrew. Will address the comments, except: bq. Do we need this check? The sleep right before it will throw InterruptedException and clear the interrupted status. The reason for this is to handle {{shutdownNow}} - in which case the runnable will be interrupted. If we happen to be not in {{Thread.sleep}} block, we should exit. right? bq. It looks like we're trying to ride out KMS downtime, so is there a downside to retrying indefinitely? I think retrying definitely would be the KISS solution. I feel configuration won't help much for most users. Retry interval maybe good to be configurable. Will change into this manner if no objections. > When starting a file, NameNode should generate EDEK in a separate thread > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-9405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9405 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: encryption, namenode > Affects Versions: 2.7.1 > Reporter: Zhe Zhang > Assignee: Xiao Chen > Attachments: HDFS-9405.01.patch, HDFS-9405.02.patch, HDFS-9405.03.patch, HDFS-9405.04.patch, HDFS-9405.05.patch, HDFS-9405.06.patch, HDFS-9405.07.patch, HDFS-9405.08.patch > > > {{generateEncryptedDataEncryptionKey}} involves a non-trivial I/O operation to the key provider, which could be slow or cause timeout. It should be done as a separate thread so as to return a proper error message to the RPC caller. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)