hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9395) Make HDFS audit logging consistant
Date Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:59:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15156649#comment-15156649
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9395:
---------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 18s {color} | {color:blue}
Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color} | {color:green}
The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color}
| {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 9m 13s {color}
| {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 3s {color} | {color:green}
trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 53s {color} |
{color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 27s {color}
| {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 8s {color} | {color:green}
trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 18s {color}
| {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 15s {color} |
{color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 36s {color} |
{color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 22s {color} |
{color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m 5s {color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 13s {color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m 13s {color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 54s {color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 54s {color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s {color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 8s {color} | {color:green}
the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s {color}
| {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color}
| {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 39s {color} |
{color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 37s {color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 18s {color} |
{color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 120m 12s {color} | {color:red}
hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_72. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 113m 47s {color} | {color:red}
hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 32s {color}
| {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 268m 55s {color} | {color:black}
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_72 Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestEditLogTailer |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.shortcircuit.TestShortCircuitCache |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeMultipleRegistrations |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.TestFsDatasetImpl |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.security.TestDelegationTokenForProxyUser |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailure |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBlockReplacement |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestOpenFilesWithSnapshot |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDirectoryScanner |
| JDK v1.8.0_72 Timed out junit tests | org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestLeaseRecovery2 |
| JDK v1.7.0_95 Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSUpgradeFromImage |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestPread |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestEditLogTailer |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeMultipleRegistrations |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.TestFsDatasetImpl |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestErasureCodeBenchmarkThroughput |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestLocalDFS |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailure |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestSafeMode |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBlockReplacement |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestDFSUpgradeWithHA |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDirectoryScanner |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:0ca8df7 |
| JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12788704/HDFS-9395.007.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-9395 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  unit  findbugs
 checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 3dbbce7f5faa 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12
UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 342c957 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_95 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_72 /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_95
|
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14556/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
|
| unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14556/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
|
| unit test logs |  https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14556/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14556/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
|
| JDK v1.7.0_95  Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14556/testReport/
|
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14556/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Make HDFS audit logging consistant
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9395
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9395
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
>         Attachments: HDFS-9395.001.patch, HDFS-9395.002.patch, HDFS-9395.003.patch, HDFS-9395.004.patch,
HDFS-9395.005.patch, HDFS-9395.006.patch, HDFS-9395.007.patch
>
>
> So, the big question here is what should go in the audit log? All failures, or just "permission
denied" failures? Or, to put it a different way, if someone attempts to do something and it
fails because a file doesn't exist, is that worth an audit log entry?
> We are currently inconsistent on this point. For example, concat, getContentSummary,
addCacheDirective, and setErasureEncodingPolicy create an audit log entry for all failures,
but setOwner, delete, and setAclEntries attempt to only create an entry for AccessControlException-based
failures. There are a few operations, like allowSnapshot, disallowSnapshot, and startRollingUpgrade
that never create audit log failure entries at all. They simply log nothing for any failure,
and log success for a successful operation.
> So to summarize, different HDFS operations currently fall into 3 categories:
> 1. audit-log all failures
> 2. audit-log only AccessControlException failures
> 3. never audit-log failures
> Which category is right?  And how can we fix the inconsistency



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message