hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "He Tianyi (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9665) Cilents are easily affected by standby namenode
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2016 03:11:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15107896#comment-15107896
] 

He Tianyi commented on HDFS-9665:
---------------------------------

Thanks. That patch worked well.

Closing issue.

> Cilents are easily affected by standby namenode
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9665
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9665
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: hdfs-client, namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: He Tianyi
>            Assignee: He Tianyi
>            Priority: Minor
>
> My case is during restarting of standby NameNode, there is chances that {{hadoop fs}}
command get hung until either IPC timeout reached or {{StandbyException}} received, and then
failover to active NameNode.
> Normally, duration of the 'hung stage' depends on {{min(timeout_configuration, rpc_queue_time)}}.
However, RPC queue in standby NameNode is usually filled with block reports at this period,
client requests can't get processed quickly.
> I wish to get rid of this, by one of the following manners:
> a) we distinguish priority in RPC queue (chances causing starvation)
> b) we speculate first request, send it to both NameNodes, and take one valid response.
> c) make client aware of HA state (by accessing ZK probably, chances causing performance
issue)
> Any suggestions or comments?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message