hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vinayakumar B (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9426) Rollingupgrade finalization is not backward compatible
Date Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:10:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15004306#comment-15004306
] 

Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-9426:
-------------------------------------

bq. After HDFS-7645, the namenode can return non-null rollingUpgradeInfo in heatbeat reponses.
2.7.1 or 2.6.x datanodes won't finalize the upgrade because it's not null.
I agree that 2.7.1 or 2.6.x datanodes wont understand finalize message.

But is that expected scenario, where cluster upgrade can be finalized without complete upgrade
of all datanodes?

> Rollingupgrade finalization is not backward compatible
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9426
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9426
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> After HDFS-7645, the namenode can return non-null {{rollingUpgradeInfo}} in heatbeat
reponses. 2.7.1 or 2.6.x datanodes won't finalize the upgrade because it's not null.
> NN might have to check the DN version and return different {{rollingUpgradeInfo}}.
> HDFS-8656 recognized the compatibility issue of the changed semantics, but unfortunately
did not address the semantics of the heartbeat response.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message