hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8647) Abstract BlockManager's rack policy into BlockPlacementPolicy
Date Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:41:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14957361#comment-14957361
] 

Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-8647:
--------------------------------------------

[~mingma] and [~vinayrpet]

Uploaded patch to address following comments....

{quote}The existing blockHasEnoughRacksStriped compares getRealDataBlockNum (# of data blocks)
with the number racks. But after the refactoring, it compares getRealTotalBlockNum (# of total
blocks) with the number racks,{quote}
{quote}
It might be easier to not to pass isStriped to verifyBlockPlacement. Instead, have BlockPlacementPolicyRackFaultTolerant
implement verifyBlockPlacement which will use numberOfReplicas as the minRacks. This also
makes the patch more applicable to branch-2 which doesn't have striped EC
{quote}


> Abstract BlockManager's rack policy into BlockPlacementPolicy
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8647
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ming Ma
>            Assignee: Brahma Reddy Battula
>         Attachments: HDFS-8647-001.patch, HDFS-8647-002.patch, HDFS-8647-003.patch, HDFS-8647-004.patch,
HDFS-8647-004.patch, HDFS-8647-005.patch, HDFS-8647-006.patch
>
>
> Sometimes we want to have namenode use alternative block placement policy such as upgrade
domains in HDFS-7541.
> BlockManager has built-in assumption about rack policy in functions such as useDelHint,
blockHasEnoughRacks. That means when we have new block placement policy, we need to modify
BlockManager to account for the new policy. Ideally BlockManager should ask BlockPlacementPolicy
object instead. That will allow us to provide new BlockPlacementPolicy without changing BlockManager.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message