hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Colin Patrick McCabe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9170) Move libhdfs / fuse-dfs / libwebhdfs to a separate module
Date Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:23:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14934782#comment-14934782
] 

Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-9170:
--------------------------------------------

I don't have any objections to moving libhdfs, fuse-dfs, and libwebhdfs to a separate hadoop-hdfs-native-client
module.  However, if the unit tests are moving with them, they will still be depending on
MiniDFSCluster in a different module (i.e.  hadoop-hdfs module).  So I'm not sure how creating
a separate module is better than moving everything to hadoop-hdfs-client.  Perhaps I'm misunderstanding
something.

> Move libhdfs / fuse-dfs / libwebhdfs to a separate module
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Haohui Mai
>            Assignee: Haohui Mai
>
> After HDFS-6200 the Java implementation of hdfs-client has be moved to a separate hadoop-hdfs-client
module.
> libhdfs, fuse-dfs and libwebhdfs still reside in the hadoop-hdfs module. Ideally these
modules should reside in the hadoop-hdfs-client. However, to write unit tests for these components,
it is often necessary to run MiniDFSCluster which resides in the hadoop-hdfs module.
> This jira is to discuss how these native modules should layout after HDFS-6200.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message