hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zhe Zhang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9040) Erasure coding: Refactor DFSStripedOutputStream (Move Namenode RPC Requests to Coordinator)
Date Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:57:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14901080#comment-14901080
] 

Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-9040:
---------------------------------

bq. but we dont know if idx 6~8 are permanent lost or delayed.
Permanently lost vs. delayed is an interesting point. Bumping GS does help us determine how
long to wait in lease recovery.

I agree we should bump GS when handling DN failures in write pipeline.

> Erasure coding: Refactor DFSStripedOutputStream (Move Namenode RPC Requests to Coordinator)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9040
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9040
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Walter Su
>         Attachments: HDFS-9040-HDFS-7285.002.patch, HDFS-9040-HDFS-7285.003.patch, HDFS-9040.00.patch,
HDFS-9040.001.wip.patch, HDFS-9040.02.bgstreamer.patch
>
>
> The general idea is to simplify error handling logic.
> Proposal 1:
> A BlockGroupDataStreamer to communicate with NN to allocate/update block, and StripedDataStreamer
s only have to stream blocks to DNs.
> Proposal 2:
> See below the [comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9040?focusedCommentId=14741388&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14741388]
from [~jingzhao].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message