Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1C3218352 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78972 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2015 19:16:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78910 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2015 19:16:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78897 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2015 19:16:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:16:05 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:16:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8805) Archival Storage: getStoragePolicy should not need superuser privilege MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14640948#comment-14640948 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8805: --------------------------------- \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | pre-patch | 17m 5s | Pre-patch trunk compilation is healthy. | | {color:green}+1{color} | @author | 0m 0s | The patch does not contain any @author tags. | | {color:red}-1{color} | tests included | 0m 0s | The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. | | {color:red}-1{color} | javac | 1m 35s | The patch appears to cause the build to fail. | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Patch URL | http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12747087/HDFS-8805-002.patch | | Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle | | git revision | trunk / d19d187 | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/11832/console | This message was automatically generated. > Archival Storage: getStoragePolicy should not need superuser privilege > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-8805 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8805 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: balancer & mover, namenode > Reporter: Hui Zheng > Assignee: Brahma Reddy Battula > Fix For: 2.6.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-8805-002.patch, HDFS-8805.patch > > > The result of getStoragePolicy command is always 'unspecified' even we has set a StoragePolicy on a directory.But the real placement of blocks is correct. > The result of fsck is not correct either. > {code} > $ hdfs storagepolicies -setStoragePolicy -path /tmp/cold -policy COLD > Set storage policy COLD on /tmp/cold > $ hdfs storagepolicies -getStoragePolicy -path /tmp/cold > The storage policy of /tmp/cold is unspecified > $ hdfs fsck -storagepolicies /tmp/cold > Blocks NOT satisfying the specified storage policy: > Storage Policy Specified Storage Policy # of blocks % of blocks > ARCHIVE:4(COLD) HOT 5 55.5556% > ARCHIVE:3(COLD) HOT 4 44.4444% > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)