Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:17:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12773939.1423597474000.30299.1423768633131@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12773939.1423597474000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12773939.1423597474000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12773939.1423597474203@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7769) TestHDFSCLI create files in hdfs
 project root dir
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14318793#comment-14318793 ] 

Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-7769:
-------------------------------------------

> The rule has been always clear for me. It may not be clearly stated in the bylaws. But then bylaws is not a tax law, where you look for loopholes.

No, it is not looking for loopholes.  I do believe that we allow trivial patches being reviewed by anyone, not necessarily committers.  Otherwise, it does not quite make sense for non-committers reviewing patches.  As least, no one has incentive to ask a non-committers to reviewing a patch.

> TestHDFSCLI create files in hdfs project root dir
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7769
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
>            Assignee: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.7.0
>
>         Attachments: h7769_20150210.patch, h7769_20150210b.patch
>
>
> After running TestHDFSCLI, two files (data and .data.crc) remain in hdfs project root dir.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)