Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9844C102C3 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91576 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2015 23:50:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91506 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2015 23:50:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91494 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2015 23:50:35 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:50:35 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:50:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ming Ma (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7725) Incorrect "nodes in service" metrics caused all writes to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14302345#comment-14302345 ] Ming Ma commented on HDFS-7725: ------------------------------- Thanks, [~zhz]. Yes, the logic of "don't modify nn stats if the node is dead" can be moved to HeartbeatManager. For the trunk version, we can wait for HDFS-7411. If HDFS-7411 isn't going to be in branch-2 anytime soon, then we will need some quick fix. Overall, can anyone find any correctness issue with the current patch? > Incorrect "nodes in service" metrics caused all writes to fail > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-7725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7725 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ming Ma > Assignee: Ming Ma > Attachments: HDFS-7725.patch > > > One of our clusters sometimes couldn't allocate blocks from any DNs. BlockPlacementPolicyDefault complains with the following messages for all DNs. > {noformat} > the node is too busy (load:x > y) > {noformat} > It turns out the {{HeartbeatManager}}'s {{nodesInService}} was computed incorrectly when admins decomm or recomm dead nodes. Here are two scenarios. > * Decomm dead nodes. It turns out HDFS-7374 has fixed it; not sure if it is intentional. cc / [~zhz], [~andrew.wang], [~atm] Here is the sequence of event without HDFS-7374. > ** Cluster has one live node. nodesInService == 1 > ** The node becomes dead. nodesInService == 0 > ** Decomm the node. nodesInService == -1 > * However, HDFS-7374 introduces another inconsistency when recomm is involved. > ** Cluster has one live node. nodesInService == 1 > ** The node becomes dead. nodesInService == 0 > ** Decomm the node. nodesInService == 0 > ** Recomm the node. nodesInService == 1 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)