Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5928104E3 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 00:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61997 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2015 00:25:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61934 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2015 00:25:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61922 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2015 00:25:35 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:25:35 +0000 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 00:25:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jing Zhao (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6651) Deletion failure can leak inodes permanently. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14302540#comment-14302540 ] Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-6651: --------------------------------- The current patch takes the #5 solution. This simplifies the quota calculation and avoids the inode leaking while deletion. Since the current snapshot solution takes COW semantic, the diffs may not contribute a lot to the NS quota usage and NN memory usage. Thus I think the incompatibility here may not be an issue. > Deletion failure can leak inodes permanently. > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-6651 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6651 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Kihwal Lee > Assignee: Jing Zhao > Priority: Critical > Attachments: HDFS-6651.000.patch, HDFS-6651.001.patch, HDFS-6651.002.patch > > > As discussed in HDFS-6618, if a deletion of tree fails in the middle, any collected inodes and blocks will not be removed from {{INodeMap}} and {{BlocksMap}}. > Since fsimage is saved by iterating over {{INodeMap}}, the leak will persist across name node restart. Although blanked out inodes will not have reference to blocks, blocks will still refer to the inode as {{BlockCollection}}. As long as it is not null, blocks will live on. The leaked blocks from blanked out inodes will go away after restart. > Options (when delete fails in the middle) > - Complete the partial delete: edit log the partial delete and remove inodes and blocks. > - Somehow undo the partial delete. > - Check quota for snapshot diff beforehand for the whole subtree. > - Ignore quota check during delete even if snapshot is present. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)