hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yongjun Zhang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7707) Edit log corruption due to delayed block removal again
Date Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:59:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14299221#comment-14299221
] 

Yongjun Zhang commented on HDFS-7707:
-------------------------------------

Thank you so much Kihwal!

What happened was, the user manually delete the dir by issuing {{Hadoop fs –rm –r –skipTrash}}
command. So it seems still related to delayed block removal. It appears that snapshot is involved
but I will confirm.


 

> Edit log corruption due to delayed block removal again
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7707
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7707
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Yongjun Zhang
>            Assignee: Yongjun Zhang
>
> Edit log corruption is seen again, even with the fix of HDFS-6825. 
> Prior to HDFS-6825 fix, if dirX is deleted recursively, an OP_CLOSE can get into edit
log for the fileY under dirX, thus corrupting the edit log (restarting NN with the edit log
would fail). 
> What HDFS-6825 does to fix this issue is, to detect whether fileY is already deleted
by checking the ancestor dirs on it's path, if any of them doesn't exist, then fileY is already
deleted, and don't put OP_CLOSE to edit log for the file.
> For this new edit log corruption, what I found was, the client first deleted dirX recursively,
then create another dir with exactly the same name as dirX right away.  Because HDFS-6825
count on the namespace checking (whether dirX exists in its parent dir) to decide whether
a file has been deleted, the newly created dirX defeats this checking, thus OP_CLOSE for the
already deleted file gets into the edit log, due to delayed block removal.
> What we need to do is to have a more robust way to detect whether a file has been deleted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message