hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Colin Patrick McCabe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7443) Datanode upgrade to BLOCKID_BASED_LAYOUT fails if duplicate block files are present in the same volume
Date Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:18:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14254028#comment-14254028
] 

Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-7443:
--------------------------------------------

Thanks for the reviews.  I ran TestDatanodeManager, TestDataNodeVolumeFailureToleration, TestDatanodeLayoutUpgrade
locally and they all passed.  The findbugs warning is about {{TestDatanodeManager,TestDataNodeVolumeFailureToleration,TestDatanodeLayoutUpgrade}},
which wasn't changed in this patch.  Committing.

I will file a follow-up for converting the {{HardLink.java}} methods to jdk7 in Hadoop 2.7+

> Datanode upgrade to BLOCKID_BASED_LAYOUT fails if duplicate block files are present in
the same volume
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7443
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7443
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: HDFS-7443.001.patch, HDFS-7443.002.patch
>
>
> When we did an upgrade from 2.5 to 2.6 in a medium size cluster, about 4% of datanodes
were not coming up.  They treid data file layout upgrade for BLOCKID_BASED_LAYOUT introduced
in HDFS-6482, but failed.
> All failures were caused by {{NativeIO.link()}} throwing IOException saying {{EEXIST}}.
 The data nodes didn't die right away, but the upgrade was soon retried when the block pool
initialization was retried whenever {{BPServiceActor}} was registering with the namenode.
 After many retries, datenodes terminated.  This would leave {{previous.tmp}} and {{current}}
with no {{VERSION}} file in the block pool slice storage directory.  
> Although {{previous.tmp}} contained the old {{VERSION}} file, the content was in the
new layout and the subdirs were all newly created ones.  This shouldn't have happened because
the upgrade-recovery logic in {{Storage}} removes {{current}} and renames {{previous.tmp}}
to {{current}} before retrying.  All successfully upgraded volumes had old state preserved
in their {{previous}} directory.
> In summary there were two observed issues.
> - Upgrade failure with {{link()}} failing with {{EEXIST}}
> - {{previous.tmp}} contained not the content of original {{current}}, but half-upgraded
one.
> We did not see this in smaller scale test clusters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message