hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6940) Initial refactoring to allow ConsensusNode implementation
Date Mon, 08 Sep 2014 22:34:29 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14126218#comment-14126218
] 

Chris Douglas commented on HDFS-6940:
-------------------------------------

bq. Committers do need to stick to the areas where they are familiar demonstrated by their
contributions. It is an unwritten rule, based on honor system.

Cos's +1 is valid; he's a committer on the Hadoop project, period. He does not require your
consent to participate in these discussions.

bq. Your veto is not argumented technically, besides being late.

Committed patches are not immune to vetos, and this is obviously a technical difference in
opinion. [~shv], could you please revert this from trunk and branch-2 while you work out an
interface that everyone can live with?

> Initial refactoring to allow ConsensusNode implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6940
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6940
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.6-alpha, 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
>             Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-6940.patch
>
>
> Minor refactoring of FSNamesystem to open private methods that are needed for CNode implementation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message