Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DA2F1195F for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97394 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2014 23:57:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97337 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2014 23:57:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97323 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2014 23:57:09 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:57:09 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:57:08 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arpit Agarwal (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6800) Determine how Datanode layout changes should interact with rolling upgrade MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14114619#comment-14114619 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-6800: ------------------------------------- Will do once Jenkins +1s the v8 patch. > Determine how Datanode layout changes should interact with rolling upgrade > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-6800 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: datanode > Affects Versions: 2.6.0 > Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe > Assignee: James Thomas > Attachments: HDFS-6800.2.patch, HDFS-6800.3.patch, HDFS-6800.4.patch, HDFS-6800.5.patch, HDFS-6800.6.patch, HDFS-6800.7.patch, HDFS-6800.8.patch, HDFS-6800.patch > > > We need to handle attempts to rolling-upgrade the DataNode to a new storage directory layout. > One approach is to disallow such upgrades. If we choose this approach, we should make sure that the system administrator gets a helpful error message and a clean failure when trying to use rolling upgrade to a version that doesn't support it. Based on the compatibility guarantees described in HDFS-5535, this would mean that *any* future DataNode layout changes would require a major version upgrade. > Another approach would be to support rolling upgrade from an old DN storage layout to a new layout. This approach requires us to change our documentation to explain to users that they should supply the {{\-rollback}} command on the command-line when re-starting the DataNodes during rolling rollback. Currently the documentation just says to restart the DataNode normally. > Another issue here is that the DataNode's usage message describes rollback options that no longer exist. The help text says that the DN supports {{\-rollingupgrade rollback}}, but this option was removed by HDFS-6005. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)