Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Jing Zhao (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12728726.1405982534863.57948.1406571760217@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12728726.1405982534863@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12728726.1405982534863@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6717) Jira HDFS-5804 breaks default
 nfs-gateway behavior for unsecured config
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14076524#comment-14076524 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-6717:
---------------------------------

+1. Thanks for the fix [~brandonli]!

> Jira HDFS-5804 breaks default nfs-gateway behavior for unsecured config
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6717
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6717
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nfs
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Jeff Hansen
>            Assignee: Brandon Li
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HDFS-6717.001.patch, HdfsNfsGateway.html
>
>
> I believe this is just a matter of needing to update documentation. As a result of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5804, the secure and unsecure code paths appear to have been merged -- this is great because it means less code to test. However, it means that the default unsecure behavior requires additional configuration that needs to be documented. 
> I'm not the first to have trouble following the instructions documented in http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.4.0/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-hdfs/HdfsNfsGateway.html
> I kept hitting a RemoteException with the message that hdfs user cannot impersonate root -- apparently under the old code, there was no impersonation going on, so the nfs3 service could and should be run under the same user id that runs hadoop (I assumed this meant the user id "hdfs"). However, with the new unified code path, that would require hdfs to be able to impersonate root (because root is always the local user that mounts a drive). The comments in jira hdfs-5804 seem to indicate nobody has a problem with requiring the nfsserver user to impersonate root -- if that means it's necessary for the configuration to include root as a user nfsserver can impersonate, that should be included in the setup instructions.
> More to the point, it appears to be absolutely necessary now to provision a user named "nfsserver" in order to be able to give that nfsserver ability to impersonate other users. Alternatively I think we'd need to configure hdfs to be able to proxy other users. I'm not really sure what the best practice should be, but it should be documented since it wasn't needed in the past.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)