Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB97A11488 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44332 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2014 21:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44285 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2014 21:49:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44224 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2014 21:49:26 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:49:26 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:49:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4114) Remove the BackupNode and CheckpointNode from trunk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976091#comment-13976091 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-4114: ------------------------------------------- [~sureshms]. # I thought I answered all of your questions here in this jira and in the hdfs-dev@ thread that was happening around the same time. I thoroughly reviewed the comment you are citing. It does not contain questions, except for one rhetorical, but it explains your reasoning well. My reasoning is summarized in [this comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4114?focusedCommentId=13841326&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13841326], which by the way contains a review comment for your earlier patch, that remained unaddressed. I think the problem here is not that I am not answering your questions, but that my answers do not favour your reasoning, which is the nature of a disagreement in general. # This jira was explicitly vetoed, and there was no consensus reached yet. I did not and could not know that somebody is putting an effort or doing work on it. # I proposed my help in fixing BakcupNode issues many times. [~sureshms] please go ahead file jiras and assign them to me. I'll do my best to address those as promptly as I can. > Remove the BackupNode and CheckpointNode from trunk > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-4114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4114 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: HDFS-4114.000.patch, HDFS-4114.001.patch, HDFS-4114.patch > > > Per the thread on hdfs-dev@ (http://s.apache.org/tMT) let's remove the BackupNode and CheckpointNode. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)