hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6066) logGenerationStamp is not needed to reduce editlog size
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:07:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923644#comment-13923644
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6066:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12633323/HDFS-6066-trunk.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/6337//console

This message is automatically generated.

> logGenerationStamp is not needed to reduce editlog size
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6066
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: chenping
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-6066-trunk.patch
>
>
> almost every logGenerationStamp has a logAddBlock followed, so we can get the newest
gs from the logAddBlock operation indirectly.this will reduce the edit log size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message