Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 842B2106D7 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16962 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2014 17:00:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16922 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2014 17:00:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16912 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2014 17:00:25 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:00:25 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:00:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kihwal Lee (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-5535) Umbrella jira for improved HDFS rolling upgrades MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5535?page=3Dcom.atlassian.= jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D13872= 269#comment-13872269 ]=20 Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-5535: ---------------------------------- bq. The total time required to upgrade a cluster MUST not exceed #Nodes_in_= cluster * 10 seconds. This is about how fast the upgrade process can go while minimally impacting= service and data availability. Please note that this is a requirement for = the upgrade feature. It does not dictate what users should do. This requir= ement exists mainly to help users estimate how soon a cluster can be upgrad= ed and also force us to guarantee estimates stay valid in the future. bq. Probably meant to say that old software should be able to support whate= ver state of the file system left after the upgrade experiment was terminat= ed? I know you didn't intended it to be, but this sounds like the requirement i= s reduced to maintaining file system integrity. It could simply be "Data du= rability must not be compromised by upgrades or downgrades". bq. May be it needs to roll edits in some special way to indicate the start= of the rolling upgrade? I believe this came up during discussions, but do not remember the conclusi= on. We will clarify this. bq. What is MTTR? Mean time to recovery. bq. Looks like Lite-Decom and =E2=80=9COptimizing DN Restart time=E2=80=9D = are competing proposals Yes, indeed. We will do the latter, which will be more in-line with existin= g tool-driven approaches. Lite-Decom may be considered in later developmen= t phases for other use cases(e.g. the case Ming Ma mentioned above), but re= gular DN rolling upgrade won't depend on it. =20 > Umbrella jira for improved HDFS rolling upgrades > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-5535 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5535 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: datanode, ha, hdfs-client, namenode > Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.2.0 > Reporter: Nathan Roberts > Attachments: HDFSRollingUpgradesHighLevelDesign.pdf > > > In order to roll a new HDFS release through a large cluster quickly and s= afely, a few enhancements are needed in HDFS. An initial High level design = document will be attached to this jira, and sub-jiras will itemize the indi= vidual tasks. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)