hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vinay (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-5496) Make replication queue initialization asynchronous
Date Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:36:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13848962#comment-13848962
] 

Vinay commented on HDFS-5496:
-----------------------------

Also added a method to get the progress of initialization. Which can be used later to show
in UI.

> Make replication queue initialization asynchronous
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5496
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5496
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Vinay
>         Attachments: HDFS-5496.patch, HDFS-5496.patch, HDFS-5496.patch
>
>
> Today, initialization of replication queues blocks safe mode exit and certain HA state
transitions. For a big name space, this can take hundreds of seconds with the FSNamesystem
write lock held.  During this time, important requests (e.g. initial block reports, heartbeat,
etc) are blocked.
> The effect of delaying the initialization would be not starting replication right away,
but I think the benefit outweighs. If we make it asynchronous, the work per iteration should
be limited, so that the lock duration is capped. 
> If full/incremental block reports and any other requests that modifies block state properly
performs replication checks while the blocks are scanned and the queues populated in background,
every block will be processed. (Some may be done twice)  The replication monitor should run
even before all blocks are processed.
> This will allow namenode to exit safe mode and start serving immediately even with a
big name space. It will also reduce the HA failover latency.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Mime
View raw message