hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-5449) WebHdfs compatibility broken between 2.2 and 1.x / 23.x
Date Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:46:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13855797#comment-13855797

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-5449:

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified
test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version
1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:


    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5788//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5788//console

This message is automatically generated.

> WebHdfs compatibility broken between 2.2 and 1.x / 23.x
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-5449
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5449
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: HDFS-5449.patch, HDFS-5449.patch, HDFS-5449.trunk.patch, HDFS-5449.trunk.patch
> Similarly to HDFS-5403, getFileBlockLocations() fail between old (1.x, 0.23.x) and new
(2.x), but this is worse since both directions won't work.  This is caused by the removal
of "name" field from the serialized json format of DatanodeInfo. 
> 2.x namenode should include "name" (ip:port) in the response and 2.x webhdfs client should
use "name", if "ipAddr" and "xferPort" don't exist in the response. 

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message