Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE8F01051C for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63167 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2013 09:00:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62542 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2013 09:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62483 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2013 09:00:27 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:00:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:00:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-5458) Datanode failed volume threshold ignored if exception is thrown in getDataDirsFromURIs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13813782#comment-13813782 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-5458: --------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12612086/HDFS-5458-1.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs. {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5335//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5335//console This message is automatically generated. > Datanode failed volume threshold ignored if exception is thrown in getDataDirsFromURIs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-5458 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5458 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: datanode > Affects Versions: 3.0.0 > Reporter: Andrew Wang > Assignee: Mike Mellenthin > Attachments: HDFS-5458-1.patch > > > Saw a stacktrace of datanode startup with a bad volume, where even listing directories would throw an IOException. The failed volume threshold was set to 1, but it would fatally error out in {{File#getCanonicalPath}} in {{getDataDirsFromURIs}}: > {code} > File dir = new File(dirURI.getPath()); > try { > dataNodeDiskChecker.checkDir(localFS, new Path(dir.toURI())); > dirs.add(dir); > } catch (IOException ioe) { > LOG.warn("Invalid " + DFS_DATANODE_DATA_DIR_KEY + " " > + dir + " : ", ioe); > invalidDirs.append("\"").append(dir.getCanonicalPath()).append("\" "); > } > {code} > Since {{getCanonicalPath}} can need to do I/O and thus throw an IOException, this catch clause doesn't properly protect startup from a failed volume. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)