hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Colin Patrick McCabe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HDFS-5378) In CacheReport, don't send genstamp and length on the wire
Date Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:19:42 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Colin Patrick McCabe updated HDFS-5378:
---------------------------------------

    Attachment: HDFS-5378-caching.003.patch

rebased

> In CacheReport, don't send genstamp and length on the wire
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5378
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5378
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-4949
>            Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
>         Attachments: HDFS-5378-caching.001.patch, HDFS-5378-caching.002.patch, HDFS-5378-caching.003.patch
>
>
> As discussed in HDFS-5096, we don't need genstamp and block length when processing cache
reports.  So let's not send them over the wire (it increases the size of cache reports to
3x what it could be).
> Also, we should report the caching statistics alongside the normal DN stats in {{StorageReport}}.
 There's no reason for them to be separate.  Since the new fields will be optional and default
to 0, there will be no extra overhead in the non-caching case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message