Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12410156.1228678456779.181413.1358976554277@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12410156.1228678456779@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12410156.1228678456779@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-347) DFS read performance suboptimal when
 client co-located on nodes with data
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13561102#comment-13561102 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-347:
--------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12566173/hdfs-347-merge.txt
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 21 new or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:

                  org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestPeerCache

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/3874//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/3874//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> DFS read performance suboptimal when client co-located on nodes with data
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-347
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode, hdfs-client, performance
>            Reporter: George Porter
>            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
>         Attachments: all.tsv, BlockReaderLocal1.txt, HADOOP-4801.1.patch, HADOOP-4801.2.patch, HADOOP-4801.3.patch, HDFS-347-016_cleaned.patch, HDFS-347.016.patch, HDFS-347.017.clean.patch, HDFS-347.017.patch, HDFS-347.018.clean.patch, HDFS-347.018.patch2, HDFS-347.019.patch, HDFS-347.020.patch, HDFS-347.021.patch, HDFS-347.022.patch, HDFS-347.024.patch, HDFS-347.025.patch, HDFS-347.026.patch, HDFS-347.027.patch, HDFS-347.029.patch, HDFS-347.030.patch, HDFS-347.033.patch, HDFS-347.035.patch, HDFS-347-branch-20-append.txt, hdfs-347-merge.txt, hdfs-347-merge.txt, hdfs-347-merge.txt, hdfs-347.png, hdfs-347.txt, local-reads-doc
>
>
> One of the major strategies Hadoop uses to get scalable data processing is to move the code to the data.  However, putting the DFS client on the same physical node as the data blocks it acts on doesn't improve read performance as much as expected.
> After looking at Hadoop and O/S traces (via HADOOP-4049), I think the problem is due to the HDFS streaming protocol causing many more read I/O operations (iops) than necessary.  Consider the case of a DFSClient fetching a 64 MB disk block from the DataNode process (running in a separate JVM) running on the same machine.  The DataNode will satisfy the single disk block request by sending data back to the HDFS client in 64-KB chunks.  In BlockSender.java, this is done in the sendChunk() method, relying on Java's transferTo() method.  Depending on the host O/S and JVM implementation, transferTo() is implemented as either a sendfilev() syscall or a pair of mmap() and write().  In either case, each chunk is read from the disk by issuing a separate I/O operation for each chunk.  The result is that the single request for a 64-MB block ends up hitting the disk as over a thousand smaller requests for 64-KB each.
> Since the DFSClient runs in a different JVM and process than the DataNode, shuttling data from the disk to the DFSClient also results in context switches each time network packets get sent (in this case, the 64-kb chunk turns into a large number of 1500 byte packet send operations).  Thus we see a large number of context switches for each block send operation.
> I'd like to get some feedback on the best way to address this, but I think providing a mechanism for a DFSClient to directly open data blocks that happen to be on the same machine.  It could do this by examining the set of LocatedBlocks returned by the NameNode, marking those that should be resident on the local host.  Since the DataNode and DFSClient (probably) share the same hadoop configuration, the DFSClient should be able to find the files holding the block data, and it could directly open them and send data back to the client.  This would avoid the context switches imposed by the network layer, and would allow for much larger read buffers than 64KB, which should reduce the number of iops imposed by each read block operation.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira