Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C46CD913 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 19:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44493 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2012 19:32:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44438 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2012 19:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44429 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2012 19:32:12 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:32:12 +0000 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 06:32:12 +1100 (NCT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1519038632.160499.1349292732373.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> In-Reply-To: <4335590.3899.1331577879305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3077) Quorum-based protocol for reading and writing edit logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13468759#comment-13468759 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HDFS-3077: ------------------------------------ Section 2.8 Recovery Algorithm You list 4 steps and have comments that steps 2 and 4 correspond with the the two phases of paxos. However you add step 3 in the middle which is not part of paxos. Hence I am not sure if the informal arguments of correctness that you mention in the document apply. Another concern is that this design has more steps than paxos which is generally considered complicated to get right. > Quorum-based protocol for reading and writing edit logs > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-3077 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3077 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ha, name-node > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: QuorumJournalManager (HDFS-3077) > > Attachments: hdfs-3077-partial.txt, hdfs-3077-test-merge.txt, hdfs-3077.txt, hdfs-3077.txt, hdfs-3077.txt, hdfs-3077.txt, hdfs-3077.txt, hdfs-3077.txt, hdfs-3077.txt, qjournal-design.pdf, qjournal-design.pdf, qjournal-design.pdf, qjournal-design.pdf, qjournal-design.pdf, qjournal-design.tex, qjournal-design.tex > > > Currently, one of the weak points of the HA design is that it relies on shared storage such as an NFS filer for the shared edit log. One alternative that has been proposed is to depend on BookKeeper, a ZooKeeper subproject which provides a highly available replicated edit log on commodity hardware. This JIRA is to implement another alternative, based on a quorum commit protocol, integrated more tightly in HDFS and with the requirements driven only by HDFS's needs rather than more generic use cases. More details to follow. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira